>
Skip to Main Content
Nuclear Energy Institute
Login
<%= Search_text %>
Submit
Menu
Site Navigation
Fundamentals
Expand Navigation
What Is Nuclear Energy?
How a Nuclear Reactor Works
Nuclear Fuel
Nuclear Waste
Safety
Environmental Justice Principles
Advanced
Expand Navigation
Advanced Nuclear 101
Value of Advanced Nuclear
The Road to Deployment
Investing in the Future
Opportunities for Industries
Advanced Nuclear FAQ
Advantages
Expand Navigation
Climate
Infrastructure
Sustainable Development
Technology Leadership
Jobs
Air Quality
National Defense
Energy Security
Invest
Expand Navigation
Investors
Customers
Advocacy
Expand Navigation
Make Regulations Smarter
Compete Globally
Take Action
Voices For Nuclear
Events
Expand Navigation
FAQs
NEI+ Training
Newsroom
Expand Navigation
Blog
Press Release
Fissionary
Off the Menu
Press Statement
Campaign
Events
Media Center
Search News
Resources
Expand Navigation
Updates on the Situation in Ukraine
U.S. Nuclear Plants
Statistics
Fact Sheets
Reports & Briefs
Testimony
Letters, Filings & Comments
Comparing Fukushima and Chernobyl
fact sheet
Safety
October 2019
Share This
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Key Facts
Both the 2011 accident at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear energy facility in Japan and the Chernobyl accident in the former Soviet Union in 1986 required countermeasures to protect the public. This fact netted both accidents the highest rating on the International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale (INES). However, the accidents were starkly different in their cause, the governments’ response and health effects.
The accident at Fukushima occurred after a series of tsunami waves struck the facility and disabled systems needed to cool the nuclear fuel.
The accident at Chernobyl stemmed from a flawed reactor design and human error. It released about 10 times the radiation that was released after the Fukushima accident.
According to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), there was less total atmospheric release of radioactivity from the Fukushima accident compared with Chernobyl due to the different accident scenarios and mechanisms of radioactive releases.
In Chernobyl, the release started with a nuclear criticality accident which triggered an in-core steam explosion, causing an intensive ejection of the overheated core material and extensive burning of graphite and reactor materials over a long period of time. The release was not confined because that type of reactor did not have a containment structure as designed in all U.S. reactors. As a result, radioactivity had a direct open path to the environment, enhanced by entrainment in the smoke from the burning graphite.
At Fukushima, there were no explosions within the cores. Rather, progressive heating, oxidation and meltdown of the cores occurred over a much longer period of time. The radioactive products were thus released from the core much more gradually, with some of the radioactive material confined by containment structures which partially retained the radioactivity. Also, the plant’s suppression pool water provided scrubbing (or “cleaning”) of radioactive products that reduced the atmospheric release at Fukushima.
The Japanese government moved rapidly to implement protective measures, evacuating people and halting food shipments from the area. The government also distributed potassium iodide to residents near the facility to prevent their thyroid glands from absorbing radiation. These actions limited any adverse health effects from the accident.
Authorities in the former Soviet Union were slow to act to protect the supply of food and milk, which led to a spike in thyroid cancers among children and adolescents from consuming contaminated foodstuffs.
No deaths from radiation exposure have been attributed to the accident at Fukushima. Separate studies published in 2013 by the United Nations (UN) and the World Health Organization concluded that health risks from radiation released during the Fukushima accident are minimal, even for those “most affected,” and there are essentially no health effects outside Japan.
At Chernobyl, 28 highly exposed workers died within four months of the accident. Experts say there is “some evidence” of an increased risk of leukemia and cataracts among workers who received higher doses when engaged in recovery efforts. Long-term health monitoring of these workers is ongoing. As of 2005, about 15 children had died from thyroid cancer. Improved monitoring has been implemented to help ensure that thyroid cancer is detected early, when it is highly treatable. However, countermeasures taken over the next few years after the accident kept radiation doses relatively low. The resulting doses “should not lead to substantial health effects in the general population,” according to a 2011 report from the United Nations.
Share This
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Related Information
WHO 2013 Report
UNSCEAR 2013 Report
UNSCEAR 2008 Report
WNA on Fukushima
IAEA 2015 Report
Nuclear Energy Institute
Close Menu
Mobile Site Navigation
Fundamentals
Expand Navigation
What Is Nuclear Energy?
How a Nuclear Reactor Works
Nuclear Fuel
Nuclear Waste
Safety
Environmental Justice Principles
Advanced
Expand Navigation
Advanced Nuclear 101
Value of Advanced Nuclear
The Road to Deployment
Investing in the Future
Opportunities for Industries
Advanced Nuclear FAQ
Advantages
Expand Navigation
Climate
Infrastructure
Sustainable Development
Technology Leadership
Jobs
Air Quality
National Defense
Energy Security
Invest
Expand Navigation
Investors
Customers
Advocacy
Expand Navigation
Make Regulations Smarter
Compete Globally
Take Action
Voices For Nuclear
Events
Expand Navigation
FAQs
NEI+ Training
Newsroom
Expand Navigation
Blog
Press Release
Fissionary
Off the Menu
Press Statement
Campaign
Events
Media Center
Search News
Resources
Expand Navigation
Updates on the Situation in Ukraine
U.S. Nuclear Plants
Statistics
Fact Sheets
Reports & Briefs
Testimony
Letters, Filings & Comments
<%= Search_text %>
Submit
Member Login